Derek Cooper
Visiting Professor of Church History and New Testament
Biblical Theological Seminary
dcooper@biblical.edu
Throughout the history of the church, commentators on the epistle of James have
variously reconciled the author's view on the doctrine of justification with the
apostle Paul's. Certain interpreters in the sixteenth century such as Martin
Luther, however, opposed the reconciliation of James and Paul. Although post-
Reformation Protestants collectively adopted many of Luther's views, they did
not reject the authority of James as Luther had. This article argues that Puritan
commentators, though holding tenaciously to the doctrine of justification by
faith alone, defended the canonicity of James based primarily on their persis-
tent use of the analogy of faith.
Current Issue:
VOLUME 26, No. 2
Fall 2023
William R. Baker
SCJ Editor
James Sedlacek
Review Coordinator
Betsy Chastain
Conference Registration & Subscription Manager
(513) 284-5835
Joni Sullivan Baker
Director of Development and Communications
Jeff Painter
Conference Paper Coordinator & Copyeditor
Advertising Manager